Counter-terrorism Legislation and Terrorist Attacks: does human rights have space?

Heloisa Tenello Bretas, Daniel Damásio Borges

Résumé


The proposed theory for this study argues that terrorist attacks affect people’s perception of security, creating an intense sensation of fear that leads to the support of repressive measures to counter terrorism. Evaluating United States before and after 9/11, this study found that terrorist attacks result in intense perception of danger and a consequent sensation of fear. In turn, this fear led to the support of relaxation of due process, sacrifice of civil liberties in exchange of security, and torture. The legislation analysis presented relaxation of due process rights, especially with the acceptance of illegal evidence, the only indicator that followed the causation process here proposed. Even though it was not found strong support for the theory, the study presents that the fear populations experience after terrorist attacks is connected with high support for the assassination of suspects of terrorism, which was a real surprise. Therefore, campaigns like #wearenotafraid, are interesting mechanisms to be propagated in order to reduce the sensation of insecurity among citizens and to maintain a certain rationality to calculate the costs and benefits of the measures proposed, not accepting undue restrictions.

Mots-clés


Terrorism; Counter-terrorism Legislation; Human Rights; Fear; Security

Texte intégral :

PDF (English)

Références


ANGLÍ, M. L. What does terrorism means? In: MASFERRER, A.; WALKER, C. Counter-terrorism, human rights and the rule of law: crossing legal boundaries in defence of the state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013.

ANTI-TERRORISM ACT. Anti-terrorism and effective death penalty act of 1996. Public Law 104–132. April 24, 1996. Available on: https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ132/PLAW-104publ132.pdf.

BECK, Ulrich. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications, 1992.

BENNETT, A.; CHECKEL, J. T. Process tracing: from metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

BORGES, D. D. O princípio do desenvolvimento sustentável no direito internacional público. In: MANIGLIA, E. (Org.). 50 anos do estatuto da terra: 25 anos de direito agrário na UNESP. São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2014. p. 179-196.

BRAITHWAITE, A. The logic of public fear in terrorism and counter-terrorism. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, v. 28, p. 95-101, 2013. DOI 10.1007/s11896-013-9126-x.

BREEDON, Jennifer. Redefining terrorism: the danger of misunderstanding the modern world’s gravest threat. Revista de Direito Internacional, Brasília, v. 12, n. 2, 2015 p. 463-483.

CANOTILHO, J. J. G. Terrorismo e direitos fundamentais. In: CANOTILHO, J. J. G. Estudos sobre direitos fundamentais. São Paulo: Coimbra; Revista dos Tribunais 2008.

CHOMSKY, N. The culture of terrorism. Boston: South End Press, 1988.

CHOMSKY, N. International terrorism: image and reality. In: GEORGE, A. (Ed.). Western state terrorism. New York: Routledge, 1991. p. 12-38.

CONN, T. L. Use of secret evidence by government lawyers: balancing defendants’ rights with national security concerns. Cleveland State Law Review, 2004. Available on: http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1297&context=clevstlrev.

DOUGLAS, R. Law, liberty, and the pursuit of terrorism. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2014.

DOWLING, N. T. Protection of human rights under the United States constitution. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, v. 243, p. 96–100, 1946. Available on: http://www.jstor.org/ stable/1025061.

FITZPATRICK, J. Speaking law to power: the war against terrorism and human rights. European Journal of International Law, v. 14, n. 2, apr. 2003.

FRIEDLAND, N.; MERARI, A. The psychological impact of terrorism: a double-edged sword. Polit Psychol, v. 6, p. 591–604, 1985.

GALLUP. Terrorism in the United States. Gallup. Available on: http://www.gallup.com/poll/4909/terrorism-united-states.aspx. GALLUP. War on terrorism. Gallup. Available on: http://www.g allup.com/poll/5257/War-terrorism. aspx?g_source=ter rorism%202001&g_ medium=search&g_campaign=tiles.

GEORGE, A. Introduction. In: GEORGE, A. (Ed.). Western state terrorism. New York: Routledge, 1991. p. 1–11.

GILL, L. The school of the Americas: military training and political violence in the Americas. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.

GRONKE, et al. U.S. public opinion on torture: 2001– 2009. Symposium: Terrorism and Human Rights, july 2010. DOI:10.1017/S1049096510000697.

GTD. Using GTD. Data collection methodology: data collection and the definition of terrorism. Global Terrorism Database. Available on: https://www.start.umd. edu/gtd/using-gtd/.

GTD. GTD ID: 200109110004. When: 2001-09-11. Country: United States. Global terrorism database. Available on: https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/IncidentSummary. aspx?gtdid=200109110004.

GTD. GTD ID: 200109110005. When: 2001-09-11. Country: United States. Global terrorism database. Availableon: https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/IncidentSummary. aspx?gtdid=200109110005.

GTD. GTD ID: 200109110006. When: 2001-09-11. Country: United States. Global terrorism database. Available on: https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/IncidentSummary. aspx?gtdid=200109110006.

GTD. GTD ID: 200109110007. When: 2001-09-11. Country: United States. Global terrorism database. Available on: https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/IncidentSummary. aspx?gtdid=200109110007.

HAHN, R. W.; SUNSTAIN, C. R. The precautionary principle as a basis for decision making. The Economists’ Voice, v. 2, n. 2, article 8, 2005.

HOFFMAN, L. A v Secretary of State for the Home Department. UKHL. 56 para 96, 2004.

HOFFMAN, B. Inside terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006. v. 2.

HOWIE, L. Terrorism, the worker and the city. Farnham: Gower, 2012.

JAMES, B. 9/11 Conspiracy theories: inside the lonely lives of truthers, still looking for their big break. International Business Times, sep. 2015. Available on: http://www.ibtimes.com/911-conspiracy-theoriesinside-lonely-lives-truthers-still-looking-their-big-break-2091474.

LENNON, G. Precautionary tales: suspicionless counter-terrorism stop and search. Criminology & Criminal Justice, v. 15, n. 1, p. 44-62, 2013. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895813509637.

LONG, E. The anatomy of terrorism. New York: Free Press, 1990.

LUSTICK, I. S. Trapped in the war on terror. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006.

MASFERRER, A.; WALKER, C. Countering terrorism and crossing legal boundaries. In: MASFERRER, A.;WALKER, C. Counter-terrorism, human rights and the rule of law: crossing legal boundaries in defence of the state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013.

MASFERRER, A. The fragility of fundamental rights in the origins of modern constitutionalism: its negative impact in protecting human rights in the “war on terror” era. In: MASFERRER, A.; WALKER, C. Counter-terrorism, human rights and the rule of law: crossing legal boundaries in defence of the state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013.

MOGUL, P. Jakarta attacks: indonesians share ‘we are not afraid’ #KamiTidakTakut message on Twitter. International Business Times, jan. 2016. Available on: https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/jakarta-attacks-indonesians-share-we-are-not-afraid-kamitidaktakut-messagetwitter-1537913.

PATRIOT ACT. Uniting and strengthening America by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) act of 2001. Available on: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/ BILLS-107hr3162enr/pdf/BILLS-107hr3162enr.pdf.

PELLET, S. A ambiguidade da noção de terrorismo. In: BRANT, L. N. C. (Coord.). Terrorismo e direito: os impactos do terrorismo na comunidade internacional e no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2003.

PEW RESEARCH CENTER. Americans open to dissenting views on the war on terrorism. Pew Research Center. October 4, 2001. Available on: http://www.people-press. org/2001/10/04/americans-open-to-dissenting-viewson-the-war-on-terrorism/.

PEW RESEARCH CENTER. American psyche reeling from terror attacks. Pew Research Center. September 19, 2001. Available on: http://www. people-press.org/2001/09/19/other-important-findings-and-analyses-48/.

RAND. Database scope. Database of worldwide terrorism incidents (RDWTI). Available on: https://www.rand.org/nsrd/projects/terrorism-incidents/about/definitions.html.

RAND. Terrorism incidents database search. Incident detail: Sep 11, 2001. Washington, DC, United States. Al Qaeda. Database of Worldwide Terrorism Incidents (RDWTI). Available on: http://smapp.rand.org/rwtid/incident_detail.php?id=7759.

RAND. Terrorism incidents database search. Incident detail: Sep 11, 2001. Shanksville, United States. Al Qaeda. Database of Worldwide Terrorism Incidents (RDWTI). Available on: http://smapp.rand.org/rwtid/incident_detail.php?id=7758.

RAND. Terrorism incidents database search. Incident detail: Sep 11, 2001. New York City, United States. Al Qaeda. Database of Worldwide Terrorism Incidents (RDWTI). Available on: http://smapp.rand.org/rwtid/incident_detail.php?id=7757.

RAPOPORT, D. The four waves of rebel terror and September 11. Anthropoetics, v. 8, n. 1, spring/summer 2002. Available on: http://anthropoetics.ucla.edu/ap0801/terror/.

SCHMID, A. Terrorism: the definitional problem. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, v. 36, n. 375, 2004. Available on: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1400&context=jil.

SECRET evidence in the War on Terror. Harvard Law Review, v. 118, n. 6, p. 1962-1984, 2005. Available on: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.its.uu.se/stable/4093289.

SHANTY, F. Impact of 9/11 on U.S. public opinion. In: GOLDMAN, J. (Ed.). The war on terror encyclopedia: from the rise of Al Qaeda to 9/11 and beyond. ABC-CLIO; LLC, 2014.

SHOR, et al. Terrorism and state repression of human rights: a cross-national time-series analysis. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, v. 55, n. 4, 2014.

SIKKINK, K. Mixed signals: U.S. human rights policy and Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004.

STATISTIC BRAIN. 9/11 death statistics. Statistic Brain, nov. 2015. Available on: https://www.statisticbrain. com/911-death-statistics/. STERN, J.; WIENER, J. Precaution against terrorism. Journal of Risk Research, v. 9, n. 4, p. 393-447, 2006. Available on: https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/files/Precaution%20Against%20Terrorism.pdf.

THE GUARDIAN. Text of George Bush’s speech: State of the Union Address. The Guardian, sept. 21, 2001. Available on: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/21/september11.usa13.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Patterns of global ter rorism 2001. United States Department of State, 2002. Available on: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/10319.pdf.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Patterns of global terrorism 2003. United States Department of State, 2004. Available on: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/ 31932.pdf.

UNITED NATIONS. Rio declaration on environment and development 1992. The United Nations conference on environment and development. Rio de Janeiro, 3, to 14, jun. 1992. Available on: http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/RIO_E.PDF.

UNHR. Status of ratification interactive dashboard. ratification of 18 international human rights treaties. United Nations Human Rights: Office of the High Commissioner. Available on: http://indicators.ohchr.org/.

UNSC. United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373. Adopted by the Security Council at its 4385th meeting, on 28 September 2001. Available on: https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/terrorism/res_1373_english.pdf.

WHITE, J. Abu Ghraib tactics were first used at Guantanamo. The Washington Post, july 14, 2005. Available on: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/13/AR2005071302380.html.

WILKINSON, P. Terrorism versus democracy: the liberal state response. 3. ed. Taylor & Francis, 2011.

WPB. Highest to lowest: prison population total. World Prison Brief. Institute for Criminal Policy Research. Available on: http://www.prisonstudies.org/highestto-lowest/prison-population-total?field_region_taxonomy_tid=All.

WPO. American and international opinion on the rights of terrorism suspects. Principal Investigator: Steven Kull. The World Public Opinion, 2006. Available on: http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/jul06/TerrSuspect_Jul06_rpt.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v15i2.5300

ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia